Abstract
Three-dimensional simulation of a multiphase flow is performed using the Eulerian-Eulerian finite volume method in order to evaluate the separation efficiency and velocity field of deoiling hydrocyclones. The solution is developed using a mass conservation-based algorithm (MCBA) with collocated grid arrangement. The mixture approach of the Reynolds stress model is also employed in order to capture features of turbulent multiphase swirling flow. The velocity field and separation efficiency of two different configurations of deoiling hydrocyclones are compared with available experimental data. The comparison shows that the separation efficiency can be predicted with high accuracy using computational fluid dynamics. The velocity fields are also in good agreement with available experimental velocity measurements. Special attention is drawn to swirl intensity in deoiling hydrocyclones and it is shown that the differences in velocity and volume fraction fields of different configurations are related to swirl distribution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai Z, Wang H and Tu S. Experimental study of flow patterns in deoiling hydrocyclone. Miner. Eng. 2009. 22(4): 319–323
Belaidi A and Thew M T. The effect of oil and gas content on the controllability and separation in a de-oiling hydrocyclone. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2003. 81(3): 305–314
Caldentey J C. A Mechanistic Model for Liquid Hydrocyclones (LHC). MS Thesis. The University of Tulsa. 2000
Carver M B. A method of limiting intermediate values of volume fraction in iterative two-fluid computations. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 1982. 24: 221–224
Choi M S. Hydrocyclone produced water treatment for offshore developments. Paper SPE 20662 presented at 65th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1990, New Orleans
Colman D. The Hydrocyclone for Separating Light Dispersions. Ph.D. Thesis. Southampton University, UK. 1981
Colman D and Thew M. Hydrocyclone to give a highly concentrated sample of a lighter dispersed phase. Presented at International Conference on Hydrocyclones, 1980, BHRA, Cambridge, United Kingdom 15: 209–223
Colman D and Thew M. Correlation of separation results from light dispersion hydrocyclones. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1983. 61: 233–240
Colman D and Thew M. Cyclone Separator. U.S. Patent: 4764287. 1988
Colman D, Thew M and Corney D. Hydrocyclones for oil/water separation. Presented at International Conference on Hydrocyclones, 1980, BHRA, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 11: 143–165
Darwish M and Moukalled F. Normalized variable and space formulation methodology for high-resolution schemes. Numer. Heat Transfer B. 1994. 26(1): 79–96.
Darwish M, Moukalled F and Sekar B. A unified formulation of the segregated class of algorithms for multifluid flow at all speeds. Numer. Heat Transfer Part B. 2001. 40(2): 99–137
Davidson L and Farhanieh B. Manual of CALC-BFC. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. 1991
Ditria J C and Hoyack M E. The separation of solids and liquids with hydrocyclone based technology for water and crude processing. Paper SPE 28815 presented at SPE Asia and Pacific Oil & Gas Conference, 1994, Melbourne
Drew D A. Mathematical modeling of two-phase flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1983. 15: 261–291
Enwald H, Peirano E and Almstedt A E. Eulerian two-phase flow theory applied to fluidization. International Journalof Multiphase Flow. 1996. 22(1): 21–66
Falnigan D A, Stolhand J E, Shimoda E, et al. Use of low-shear pumps and hydrocyclones for improved performance in the cleanup of low-pressure water. Paper SPE 19743 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1992, San Antonio
Ferziger J H and Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2002
Gomez C H. Oil-water separation in liquid-liquid hydrocyclones (LLHC): Experiment and modeling. MS Thesis. The University of Tulsa. 2001
Grady S A, Wesson G D, Abdullah M, et al. Prediction of 10-mm hydrocyclone separation efficiency using computational fluid dynamics. Filtr. Sep. 2003. 40(9): 41–46
Hargreaves J H and Silvester R S. Computational fluid dynamics applied to the analysis of deoiling hydrocyclone performance. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1990. 68(4): 365–383
Huang S. Numerical simulation of oil-water numerical simulation of oil-water hydrocyclone using Reynolds-stress model for Eulerian multiphase flows. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2005. 83(5): 829–834
Husveg T, Rambeau O, Drengstig T, et al. Performance of a deoiling hydrocyclone during variable flow rates. Miner. Eng. 2007. 20(4): 368–379
Ishii M. Thermo-fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow. 1975. Paris: Eyrolles
Jones P S. A field comparison of static and dynamic hydrocyclones. Paper SPE 20701 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1993, New Orleans
Kharoua N, Khezzar L and Nemouchi Z. Hydrocyclones for de-oiling applications—A review. Pet. Sci. Tech. 2010. 28(7): 738–755
Launder B E, Reece G J and Rodi W. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 1975. 68: 537–566
Lien F S and Leschziner M A. Assessment of turbulence-transport models including non-linear RNG eddy-viscosity formulation and second-moment closure for flow over a backward-facing step. Comput. Fluids. 1994. 23(8): 983–1004
Meldrum N. Hydrocyclones: A solution to produced-water treatment. Paper SPE 16642 presented at 19th Annual Conference on Offshore Technology, 1988, Houston
Moukalled F and Darwish M. Pressure-based algorithms for multifluid flow at all speeds—Part I: Mass conservation formulation. Numer. Heat Transfer Part B. 2004. 45(6): 495–522
Noort F J, Etten J P and Donders R S. Reduction of residual oil content in produced water at offshore gas production platform P/6A. Paper SPE 20882 presented at Europe’s 90 Conference, 1990, Netherlands
Noroozi S and Hashemabadi S H. CFD simulation of inlet design effect on deoiling hydrocyclone separation efficiency. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009. 32(12): 1885–1893
Noroozi S and Hashemabadi S H. CFD analysis of inlet chamber body profile effects on de-oiling hydrocyclone efficiency. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011. 8(7): 968–977
Petty C A and Parks S M. Flow structures within miniature hydrocyclones. Miner. Eng. 2004. 17(5): 615–624
Rhie C M and Chow L W. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J. 1983. 21(11): 1527–1532
Saboni A and Alexandrova S. Numerical study of the drag on a fluid sphere. AIChE J. 2002. 48(12): 2992–2994
Sheng H P, Welker J R and Sliepcevich C M. Liquid-liquid separation in a conventional hydrocyclone. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1974. 52(4): 487–491
Simkin D J and Olney R B. Phase separation and mass transfer in a liquid-liquid cyclone. AIChE J. 1956. 2(4): 545–551
Thew M T. Hydrocyclone redesign for liquid-liquid separation. The Chem. Engineer. 1986. July/August: 17–23
Van den Broek W M G T and Plat R. Characteristics and possibilities of some techniques for de-oiling of production water. Paper SPE 23315 presented at First International Conference on Health, Safety and Environmental. 1991.
Netherlands Van den Broek W M G T, Plat R and Van der Zande M J. Comparison of plate separator, centrifuge and hydrocyclone. Paper SPE 48870 presented at SPE International Conference and Exhibition, 1998, Beijing
Wilcox C D. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 1994. DCW Industries Inc.
Wolbert D, Ma B F, Aurelle Y, et al. Efficiency estimation of liquid-liquid hydrocyclones using trajectory analysis. AIchE J. 1995. 41(6): 1395–1402
Young G A B, Wakley W D, Taggart D L, et al. Oil-water separation using hydrocyclones: An experimental search for optimum dimensions. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 1994. 11(1): 37–50
Zhou N, Gao Y, An W, et al. Investigation of velocity field and oil distribution in an oil-water hydrocyclone using a particle dynamics analyzer. Chem. Eng. J. 2009. 157(1): 73–79
Zuber N. On the dispersed two phase flow in the laminar regime. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1964. 19(11): 897–917
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maddahian, R., Asadi, M. & Farhanieh, B. Numerical investigation of the velocity field and separation efficiency of deoiling hydrocyclones. Pet. Sci. 9, 511–520 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0236-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0236-3